Share page:

I had the opportunity to participate in a Lexis Nexis webinar titled “Efficiency Vs Output: What’s the Point of Legal AI?” The panel, moderated by Matthew Leopold, Head of Brand, PR, and Content Marketing at LexisNexis, featured Laura Hodgeson, Generative AI Lead at Linklaters, and Tom Whittaker, Director at Burgess Salmon. Together, we examined how generative AI is reshaping the legal profession, highlighting its potential to enhance efficiency while posing significant challenges for lawyers, firms, and clients alike.

Our discussion focused on the critical balance between improving efficiency and maintaining output quality in legal practice. AI’s ability to automate tasks such as contract drafting, legal research, and document review is undeniably transforming how firms operate. However, this raises important questions about ensuring that the legal expertise clients expect is not compromised in the pursuit of efficiency.

Laura Hodgeson shared insights into how her firm is integrating AI into its practice, addressing both the benefits and ethical considerations that accompany this technology. She emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability, ensuring that AI tools support—not undermine—legal integrity.

Tom Whittaker provided a client-focused perspective, discussing the growing expectations for faster, more cost-effective legal services. We explored the challenge of balancing these demands with the responsibility to deliver accurate, high-quality legal counsel. Clients are increasingly aware of the potential risks associated with AI, particularly concerning data privacy and security, and they expect law firms to adeptly navigate these complexities on their behalf.

We also considered the broader implications of AI for the legal industry and debated how firms can remain competitive by adapting their practices and embracing new AI-driven tools, all while ensuring they don’t compromise on legal judgment or ethical standards. As we concluded, it’s clear that AI’s role in the legal profession will continue to grow in importance, but the human element—legal expertise, judgment, and client relationships—will remain irreplaceable.

As this technology advances, it is crucial for legal professionals, firms, and clients to proactively adapt to its changes. While the future of AI in law offers significant opportunities, it also requires careful consideration to ensure that its adoption enhances rather than diminishes the profession’s core values.


Written by:

John B. Quinn

John B. Quinn@jbqlaw

Founder @quinnemanuel, largest biz litigation firm in the world. Contemporary art champion, and father of five.

Tune in to this week's re-release of Law, disrupted, where I speak with Hidetaka Mihara about how Japan's approach to corporate law and accountability differs from what we see in the US.

We discuss what the Fukushima ruling tells us about how Japan weighs corporate risk against

Continuation funds are either a way to hold on to an asset that still has room to grow, or a way to keep troubled assets on the books at stated valuations. 

Either way, the conflicts are real and regulators are paying attention.

Read more: https://www.quinnemanuel.com/the-firm/publications/client-alert-continuation-funds-come-of-age-process-conflicts-and-the-first-wave-of-disputes/

For part two of the Law, disrupted mailbag, Alexis Hyde @hydeordie put me back on the spot with more of your questions.

We cover everything, from the future of lawyers in an AI world to career advice for young litigators. Thank you for all the questions.

🎧 Listen:

Spotify:

I recently joined Rebecca Zung on Leverage to talk about what it takes to build the most feared litigation firm in the world. We also got into how AI is reshaping the profession and why most of Big Law is not ready for what is coming.

Watch the full conversation:

For this week's episode of Law, disrupted, Alexis Hyde @hydeordie put me on the spot with a special mailbag episode answering questions from listeners.

I share my take on what makes a great litigator, why aggression isn’t always the solution, and some of the most interesting

The biggest risk is often the one you don't see.

In my latest @Forbes Business Council article, I write about what entrepreneurs get wrong about risk and what the most resilient businesses do differently.

Read:

Tune in to this week's episode of Law, disrupted, where I speak with Daniel C. Posner and Renita N. Sharma about our victory against Amazon in the Ninth Circuit on behalf of Perplexity.

The case raised a question the courts have never had to answer before: when an AI agent acts

Tune in to this week's re-release of Law, disrupted, where I speak with Michael K. Young, a man who has served as president of three universities and helped negotiate the terms under which Germany was unified.

We discuss what those experiences taught him about leadership, and